However, a team of empirical science investigators, using routine carbon-14 radiometric dating methodology, rejected that historical timeframe, arguing instead for dating the skeletons a century or so older based upon residual carbon-14 found inside the bones.

assumptions made carbon dating-61

It seemed likely they were the remains of the Scandinavian Vikings of the Great Heathen Army who wintered in Repton over a millennium ago during 873–874.

Eyewitness accounts indisputably reported the army’s historical presence during the latter 800s, so many modern historians concluded that these mass-grave skeletons were those very Vikings.

The proton takes an electron with it and becomes an atom of hydrogen.

The nitrogen atom, which began with seven protons and seven neutrons, is left with only six protons and eight neutrons.

What effect would the declining strength of the earth's magnetic field and a catastrophic worldwide flood have on radiocarbon dates?

The radioactive carbon has six protons and eight neutrons in its nucleus, giving it a total atomic mass of 14.for measuring the time-of-death data for the Repton skeletons?The normal radiometric dating scenario presumes that human skeletons contain organic material with steadily decaying radiocarbon that is traceable to plant photosynthesis, which incorporates atmospheric CO By eating plants, humans acquire carbon-14 directly.Could dates assigned by that method be vulnerable to faulty assumptions that render them invalid? The age assignment for certain Viking bones caused a decades-long controversy until the carbon-14 methodology used to date them was recently exposed for its flawed assumptions.A mass burial of 250 to 300 skeletons was discovered in the Derbyshire village of Repton, England, in the 1980s.Radiocarbon dating is considered one of science’s tried-and-true methodologies.