However, the word, Apocalypse, has the same meaning as the word Revelation, which comes from the Greek word, apokalypsis, meaning the "discourser of events," as opposed to undisclosed or mysterious.

Thus, even though Revelation has a lot of figurative phrases, it is not necessarily concealed when we take an honest look and compare it to other passages in the O. rather than pursuing trends or "newspaper eschatology." Thus, Apocalypse means something is being revealed as an "uncovering," an "unveiling," or, as we have it in the English, a "Revelation." Revelation is a book of disclosure and hope through John's seven visions and God's exhortations (Judges -23; Dan. We then see this further as Revelation opens with an elaborate greeting so we can more firmly connect our relationship with the authority that is Christ and we can receive His hope and encouragement. Vitellius, who sought to take advantage of the situation and consolidate power, but each was quickly assassinated.

Since my expertise is more in textual criticism and inductive logic, this is where I will keep my arguments as well as a look in to the "Early Church Fathers." Keep in mind; I have no "ax to grind" or theological agenda to propagate.

irenaeus dating revelation-79

two of us dating reviews - Irenaeus dating revelation

•A quote, arguably attributed to Papius (130 AD), states that John the Apostle was martyred before the destruction of Jerusalem in A. Nero died in 68 AD, and according to Roman law, those banned by a prior Caesar would be released by the succeeding Caesar.

Thus, John would have been released from Patmos around 68 AD.

Unlike letters today, the book of Revelation does not come to us postmarked with a date, so scholars and researchers need to make a reasonable assumption about the date of this book from careful study that is not based solely upon a theological agenda.

The context and word meanings of the material in Revelation do give us clues to examine.

• The "Monarchian Prologues," that dates back to 250-350 A.

D., claims that Paul also wrote to these seven churches (possibly Romans which was a "circular letter," it went out to many addressees) following John's Book, thus, placing the book even before some of the other Pauline epistles. Roman law of exile: Nero Caesar exiled John on the island of Patmos.

This would have been a belated word of comfort or a cruel joke, like a relief agency sending a Christmas card to a persecuted Christian in Sudan and saying we are praying for you, but do not worry we will help your great grand kids. The main arguments to setting a date proposed in the last post is predicated on the fact that John makes no mention of the destruction of Jerusalem or the Temple in 70 A. and thus the book must have been written prior to these events.

(I need to note that I was a diehard late-date person, but now I lean toward an early date personally. However, the retort to that is that this is an "argument from silence" which does not persuade when there is ample evidence that John wrote Revelation around 95 A. Also, when the "Olivet Discourse" (Matthew 24) is compared to Revelation, a proof is formed that is hard to rebuff.

Because it sets up what approach or view one will take-which of the four.

Two of them, the Preterist and Futurist views, are predominately hinged on it.

This word is critical to which approach and view of Revelation one takes. Another wording of note is how the tense of word and context of "beast" is used. C., at which time he also desecrated an idol of Zeus resembling himself. Herod rebuilt it, and it was just being finished at the time of Christ (Daniel , Daniel -27, Daniel , , Matthew , Revelation 11). We will also see that Matthew 24 addresses the same issues as Revelation and the same period of time as Daniel 9.